Surgeons transplant heart that had stopped
beating
Published: 24 October 2014
Source: James Gallagher, Health editor, BBC
News website
Science field: Health and transplants
Summary:
Donor hearts usually come from people who are
confirmed as brain dead, even though their heart is still beating, but now,
this has changed. A significant development took place at St Vincent’s Hospital
in Sydney, Australia. It was the transplant of a heart that stopped beating for
up to 20 minutes. The heart was kept in a machine known as “heart-in-a-box”. This
machine keeps
the donor liver functioning at body temperature so it restores the heartbeat
and nourishes fluid to reduce damage to the heart muscle.
The first patient that had this new kind of
transplant was Michelle Gribilas, 57, a woman who suffered from congenital
heart failure. Michelle has said she feels a decade younger and that she is a
"different person" now.
The breakthrough has been welcomed around the
world because it is being tested that it could save up to 30% more lives by
increasing the number of available organs.
Maureen Talbot, a senior cardiac nurse, told the
BBC: "It is wonderful to see these
people recovering so well from heart transplantation when, without this
development, they may still be waiting for a donor heart."
Glossary:
Failure – the act or an instance of failing.
Heart-in-a-box – the machine that involved taking
a heart that had stopped beating and reviving.
Nourishing – to supply with what is necessary for
life, health, and growth.
Altogether – with all or everything included.
Breakthrough – an important and sudden advance,
etc., as in science, that removes a barrier to progress.
Inroad – something that affects something else.
Perfuse – to pass (a fluid) through organ tissue
to ensure adequate exchange of oxygen and carbon monoxide.
Review:
Recent advances in the fields of organ donation
and organ transplant are nowadays increasing because of the advance of the
heart-in-a-box machine. It allows the opportunity to improve the number and
quality of organs available for transplant and it has introduced new hope for
the treatment of serious diseases. However, it has been taken several issues.
The most common is the decision whether or not to
donate organs and/or tissues for transplantation is an ethical (or moral)
decision.
There is no one ‘right’ answer to the question of
donate or not to donate. Only you can judge what will be the best. On the other
hand, there is much that can be said that will help to ensure that the decision
is wise:
-
Organ and tissue donation involves making a
decision about how someone’s body has to be treated after death. There are many
different views about this, but they all have in common that a dead body must
be treated with respect. This treatment has a great significance, not only for spiritual
and religious reasons, also for cultural and non-religious reasons.
-
Organ
and tissue donation may be seen as one of the last acts of the person who donates.
It is a decision about how that person wanted to live his or her life and be
remembered.
-
Organ
and tissue donation is also an ethical decision because it is intended to benefit
others, the recipients of organs or tissues by transplantation.
If a person dies without previously establishing whether they want to be organ donors, can their next-of-kin decide it for them?
ResponderEliminarFor many cultures, the human body is sacred and cannot be touched or used after death. If we consider all the potential donors that are influenced by religious issues, how many more people could benefit from transplants and enjoy a somewhat healthy life?
However, undergoing an organ transplant is not a bed of roses. Organ receivers have to take daily medication to avoid organ rejection, and in some cases, their bodies end up rejecting the organ anyway and need to be on the waiting list again, from hospital to hospital. It is not an easy life, but it is life nonetheless.